πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

G SalisburyvsReading

Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
2
Draws
4
Losses

When G Salisbury officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 40% win rate under G Salisbury, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-5.0%
Matches Analyzed
10

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-5.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

10 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
28 Apr 2015Rotherham(A)1 - 2LOSS
β€”
Championship
26 Dec 2014Brighton(A)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 4
Championship
14 Jan 2012Watford(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 3
Championship
17 Sept 2011Doncaster(H)2 - 0WIN
β€”
Championship
16 Apr 2011Leicester(H)3 - 1WIN
β€”
Championship
18 Sept 2010Middlesbrough(A)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
Championship
20 Apr 2010Scunthorpe(A)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 3
Championship
22 Oct 2005Stoke(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
19 Feb 2005Coventry(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
Championship
30 Oct 2004Coventry(A)2 - 3LOSS
β€”
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)40.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-5.0%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.50
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.10

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.90
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.