G HorwoodvsCheltenham
Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When G Horwood officiates Cheltenham matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cheltenham achieves a 11.1% win rate under G Horwood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 33.9 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -33.9%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 9 matches, Cheltenham has won 34 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when G Horwood is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
9 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Mar 2018 | Notts County(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 15 Oct 2016 | Crawley Town(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 3 | League Two |
| 31 Jan 2015 | Dag and Red(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | β | League Two |
| 18 Apr 2014 | Fleetwood Town(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 29 Jan 2011 | Oxford(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 17 Apr 2010 | Rotherham(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | β | League Two |
| 23 Jan 2010 | Rochdale(H) | 1 - 4 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 2 May 2009 | Southend(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League One |
| 9 Aug 2008 | Northampton(A) | 2 - 4 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Cheltenham
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.