πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

F GrahamvsNotts County

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

1
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses

When F Graham officiates Notts County matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Notts County achieves a 16.7% win rate under F Graham, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-28.3%
Matches Analyzed
6
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Notts County has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when F Graham is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-28.3%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
7 May 2016Carlisle(H)0 - 5LOSS
🟨 2
League Two
3 May 2014Oldham(A)1 - 1DRAW
β€”
League One
17 Feb 2009Macclesfield(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
League Two
29 Dec 2007Rotherham(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
League Two
9 Sept 2006Accrington(H)3 - 2WIN
β€”
League Two
7 Aug 2004Chester(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)16.7%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-28.3%

Cards for Notts County

🟨 Yellows / Game1.00
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.00
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.17

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.