πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

E IldertonvsHartlepool

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

0
Wins
1
Draws
5
Losses

When E Ilderton officiates Hartlepool matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Hartlepool achieves a 0% win rate under E Ilderton, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-45.0%
Matches Analyzed
6
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -45.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Hartlepool has won 45 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when E Ilderton is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-45.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
30 Apr 2016Portsmouth(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League Two
22 Nov 2014York(H)1 - 3LOSS
β€”
League Two
12 Apr 2014Chesterfield(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League Two
17 Mar 2012Stevenage(H)0 - 0DRAW
β€”
League One
17 Dec 2011Colchester(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
League One
26 Dec 2009Leeds(A)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 3
League One

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)0.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-45.0%

Cards for Hartlepool

🟨 Yellows / Game1.00
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.33
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.