πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

D DeadmanvsReading

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses

When D Deadman officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 42.9% win rate under D Deadman, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 2.1 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-2.1%
Matches Analyzed
7

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-2.1%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
30 Apr 2016Preston(H)1 - 2LOSS
β€”
Championship
21 Mar 2015Charlton(A)2 - 3LOSS
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1
Championship
18 Oct 2014Derby(H)0 - 3LOSS
🟨 2
Championship
17 Feb 2012Burnley(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 3
Championship
18 Dec 2010Derby(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 2
Championship
16 Jan 2010Nott'm Forest(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
21 Oct 2008Doncaster(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)42.9%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-2.1%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.57
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.14

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.43
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.14

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.