🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

D CootevsChesterfield

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
1
Draws
4
Losses

When D Coote officiates Chesterfield matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Chesterfield achieves a 28.6% win rate under D Coote, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Chesterfield has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when D Coote is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
26 Sept 2017Yeovil(H)2 - 3LOSS
🟨 2
League Two
6 Feb 2016Peterboro(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
League One
21 Feb 2015Rochdale(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
League One
26 Dec 2014Peterboro(H)3 - 2WIN
🟨 4
League One
7 Jan 2012Exeter(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League One
29 Apr 2011Torquay(A)0 - 0DRAW
League Two
9 Oct 2010Southend(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Chesterfield

🟨 Yellows / Game1.71
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.14
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.29

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.