🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

D BondvsSwansea

Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

6
Wins
1
Draws
2
Losses

When D Bond officiates Swansea matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Swansea achieves a 66.7% win rate under D Bond, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 21.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+21.7%
Matches Analyzed
9

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +21.7%, Swansea has historically performed 22 percentage points better under D Bond than their average. This favorable pattern across 9 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+21.7%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

9 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
23 Oct 2022Cardiff(H)2 - 0WIN
🟨 3
Championship
13 Sept 2022Sheffield United(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
26 Apr 2022Bournemouth(H)3 - 3DRAW
🟨 2
Championship
1 May 2021Derby(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 2
Championship
13 Mar 2021Luton(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 4
Championship
2 Jan 2021Watford(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 3
Championship
18 Jul 2020Bristol City(H)1 - 0WIN
Championship
31 Aug 2019Leeds(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
24 Nov 2018Norwich(H)1 - 4LOSS
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)66.7%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+21.7%

Cards for Swansea

🟨 Yellows / Game1.89
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.89
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.11

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.