C WebstervsLeeds
Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When C Webster officiates Leeds matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Leeds achieves a 72.7% win rate under C Webster, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 27.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
✅ FAVORABLE RECORD
This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.
Favorable Pattern Detected
With a bias score of +27.7%, Leeds has historically performed 28 percentage points better under C Webster than their average. This favorable pattern across 11 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
11 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2011 | Reading(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 1 Jan 2011 | Middlesbrough(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 21 Aug 2010 | Millwall(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | — | Championship |
| 1 Dec 2009 | Oldham(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | — | League One |
| 25 Apr 2009 | Hartlepool(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 21 Oct 2008 | Leyton Orient(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | — | League One |
| 22 Dec 2007 | Bristol Rvs(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 17 Oct 2006 | Leicester(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 5🟥 1 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2005 | Coventry(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 5 Feb 2005 | Burnley(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 20 Nov 2004 | QPR(H) | 6 - 1 | WIN | — | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Leeds
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.