C WebstervsBradford
Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When C Webster officiates Bradford matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Bradford achieves a 53.3% win rate under C Webster, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 8.3 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
15 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2012 | Oxford(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 3 Jan 2011 | Bury(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 28 Sept 2010 | Rotherham(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 24 Oct 2009 | Hereford(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 27 Jan 2009 | Bury(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | β | League Two |
| 13 Sept 2008 | Exeter(H) | 4 - 1 | WIN | β | League Two |
| 24 Mar 2008 | Chesterfield(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | β | League Two |
| 12 Oct 2007 | Morecambe(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 2 Sept 2005 | Chesterfield(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | β | League One |
| 28 Mar 2005 | Stockport(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 28 Aug 2004 | Chesterfield(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | League One |
| 17 Jan 2004 | Cardiff(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 6 Dec 2003 | Walsall(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 4 | Championship |
| 25 Mar 2003 | Burnley(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 11 Aug 2002 | Wolves(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 3 | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Bradford
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.