🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

C PawsonvsYeovil

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses

When C Pawson officiates Yeovil matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Yeovil achieves a 28.6% win rate under C Pawson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Yeovil has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when C Pawson is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
26 Dec 2013Bournemouth(A)0 - 3LOSS
🟨 4
Championship
7 Dec 2013Charlton(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 3
Championship
24 Sept 2011Scunthorpe(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League One
25 Apr 2011Peterboro(A)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 1
League One
2 Oct 2010Walsall(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League One
12 Dec 2009Norwich(H)3 - 3DRAW
🟨 4
League One
14 Feb 2009Peterboro(A)3 - 1WIN
🟨 1
League One

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Yeovil

🟨 Yellows / Game2.14
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.00
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.