B TonervsAFC Wimbledon
Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When B Toner officiates AFC Wimbledon matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows AFC Wimbledon achieves a 11.1% win rate under B Toner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 33.9 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -33.9%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 9 matches, AFC Wimbledon has won 34 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when B Toner is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
9 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Jan 2023 | Bradford(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | β | League Two |
| 27 Mar 2021 | Northampton(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 30 Jan 2021 | Milton Keynes Dons(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 7 Sept 2019 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | β | League One |
| 23 Apr 2019 | Luton(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 2 Feb 2019 | Sunderland(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | League One |
| 28 Oct 2017 | Charlton(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 4 | League One |
| 8 Mar 2016 | Bristol Rvs(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 8 Aug 2015 | Plymouth(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for AFC Wimbledon
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.