A WoolmervsSwindon
Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Woolmer officiates Swindon matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Swindon achieves a 53.3% win rate under A Woolmer, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 8.3 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
15 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2022 | Salford(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 6π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 23 Mar 2021 | Bristol Rvs(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | β | League One |
| 17 Sept 2019 | Colchester(H) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 17 Feb 2018 | Port Vale(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 30 Sept 2017 | Cambridge(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | β | League Two |
| 6 Feb 2016 | Gillingham(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League One |
| 22 Aug 2015 | Southend(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 2 Nov 2013 | Port Vale(H) | 5 - 2 | WIN | π¨ 1 | League One |
| 22 Oct 2011 | Plymouth(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 3 | League Two |
| 23 Apr 2011 | Notts County(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | β | League One |
| 3 Jan 2011 | Charlton(A) | 4 - 2 | WIN | β | League One |
| 1 May 2010 | Brentford(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | β | League One |
| 22 Mar 2008 | Brighton(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 7 Mar 2006 | Tranmere(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | β | League One |
| 8 Dec 2004 | Huddersfield(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2π₯ 1 | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Swindon
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.