A WoolmervsRochdale
Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Woolmer officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 40% win rate under A Woolmer, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
15 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Dec 2018 | Bradford(H) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | League One |
| 17 Oct 2015 | Bury(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | League One |
| 3 Apr 2015 | Preston(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | β | League One |
| 31 Jan 2015 | Coventry(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | League One |
| 22 Feb 2014 | Exeter(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 1 Jan 2014 | Scunthorpe(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 5π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 5 Nov 2011 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | β | League One |
| 4 Sept 2010 | Southampton(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | β | League One |
| 12 Dec 2009 | Lincoln(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | β | League Two |
| 27 Jan 2009 | Notts County(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | β | League Two |
| 9 Feb 2008 | Lincoln(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 6 Oct 2006 | Darlington(A) | 5 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 27 Sept 2005 | Oxford(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | League Two |
| 28 Mar 2005 | Wycombe(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 4 Sept 2004 | Grimsby(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Rochdale
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.