A PennvsHull
Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Penn officiates Hull matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Hull achieves a 16.7% win rate under A Penn, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Hull has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Penn is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
6 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2010 | Millwall(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | β | Championship |
| 27 Nov 2007 | Bristol City(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | β | Championship |
| 14 Oct 2006 | Burnley(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 19 Mar 2005 | Bournemouth(A) | 4 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1 | League One |
| 15 Jan 2005 | Peterboro(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | β | League One |
| 1 Feb 2003 | Southend(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 5 | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Hull
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.