A HainesvsRotherham
Analysis based on 12 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Haines officiates Rotherham matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 12 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rotherham achieves a 50% win rate under A Haines, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
📊 NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
12 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Mar 2022 | Lincoln(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 2 | League One |
| 28 Sept 2021 | AFC Wimbledon(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 29 Dec 2019 | Peterboro(H) | 4 - 0 | WIN | 🟥 1 | League One |
| 31 Aug 2019 | Tranmere(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 21 Apr 2018 | Bristol Rvs(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | — | League One |
| 16 Dec 2017 | Plymouth(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 1🟥 1 | League One |
| 12 Oct 2013 | Swindon(H) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | 🟨 4 | League One |
| 26 Nov 2011 | Crawley Town(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | — | League Two |
| 8 Oct 2011 | Burton(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 25 Sept 2010 | Chesterfield(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 6 Mar 2010 | Bradford(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 9 Aug 2008 | Lincoln(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | — | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Rotherham
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.17 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.