🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

A DaviesvsNott'm Forest

Analysis based on 13 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
4
Draws
5
Losses

When A Davies officiates Nott'm Forest matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 13 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Nott'm Forest achieves a 30.8% win rate under A Davies, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 14.2 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-14.2%
Matches Analyzed
13

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-14.2%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

13 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
29 Oct 2021QPR(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
Championship
24 Apr 2021Stoke(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
Championship
21 Dec 2019Huddersfield(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
26 Jan 2019Wigan(H)3 - 1WIN
🟨 4
Championship
24 Oct 2018Bolton(A)3 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
10 Apr 2018Brentford(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
Championship
17 Feb 2018Burton(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 3🟥 1
Championship
30 Sept 2017Sheffield United(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 3
Championship
7 May 2017Ipswich(H)3 - 0WIN
Championship
29 Oct 2016Reading(A)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
Championship
11 Apr 2016Brighton(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
15 Mar 2016Hull(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 2
Championship
1 Nov 2014Huddersfield(A)0 - 3LOSS
🟨 2
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)30.8%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-14.2%

Cards for Nott'm Forest

🟨 Yellows / Game2.15
🟥 Reds / Game0.08

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.77
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.