🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

A BatesvsRochdale

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
5
Draws
0
Losses

When A Bates officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 28.6% win rate under A Bates, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Rochdale has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Bates is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
3 Mar 2012Sheffield Weds(H)0 - 0DRAW
League One
27 Nov 2010Oldham(H)1 - 1DRAW
League One
28 Mar 2009Exeter(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 2
League Two
30 Aug 2008Bury(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
League Two
3 May 2008Shrewsbury(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 3
League Two
1 Sept 2007Milton Keynes Dons(H)3 - 2WIN
🟨 3
League Two
29 Sept 2001Mansfield(H)3 - 1WIN
🟨 2
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Rochdale

🟨 Yellows / Game1.57
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.14
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.